Detailed Abstract
[Oral Presentation 3 - Liver (Transplantation)]
[OP 3-7] Hepatic venous territory mapping in living donor liver transplantation using right liver graft: An objective parameter for venous reconstruction
Jinsoo RHU1 , Jong Man KIM1 , Gyu-Seong CHOI1 , Jae-Won JOH*1
1 Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University, REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Background : This study evaluated the clinical implication of hepatic venous territory mapping in living donor liver transplantation. Living donor liver transplantations performed using right graft
Methods : Hepatic venous volume mapping was started in 2019. Risk factors for graft failure and overall survival were analyzed. Analysis for factors related to occlusion of reconstructed vein was performed.
Results : Among 445 patients included, 213 underwent hepatic venous mapping. Hepatic venous mapping itself was not a significant factor for graft (HR=0.958, CI=0.441-2.082, P=0.913) and overall survival. (HR=0.627, CI=0.315-1.247, P=0.183) Inferior hepatic vein occlusion was significant risk factors for both graft survival (HR=8.795, CI=1.628-47.523, P=0.012) and overall survival (HR=11.13, CI=2.460-50.30, P=0.002). In a subgroup with middle hepatic vein reconstruction, occlusion was a significant risk factor for overall survival. (HR=3.289, CI=1.304-8.296, P=0.012) In patients with middle hepatic vein reconstruction whose venous territory volumes were measured, right anterior volume ≥300cm3 was protective for vein occlusion. (OR=0.317, CI=0.152-0.662, P=0.002) In patients with V5 reconstruction, V5 volume ≥150cm3 was protective for vein occlusion. (OR=0.253, CI=0.087-0.734, P=0.011) T
Conclusions : Inferior and middle hepatic vein reconstruction has significant impact on clinical outcome. Hepatic venous territory mapping can provide objective measure for successful reconstruction of venous branches.
Methods : Hepatic venous volume mapping was started in 2019. Risk factors for graft failure and overall survival were analyzed. Analysis for factors related to occlusion of reconstructed vein was performed.
Results : Among 445 patients included, 213 underwent hepatic venous mapping. Hepatic venous mapping itself was not a significant factor for graft (HR=0.958, CI=0.441-2.082, P=0.913) and overall survival. (HR=0.627, CI=0.315-1.247, P=0.183) Inferior hepatic vein occlusion was significant risk factors for both graft survival (HR=8.795, CI=1.628-47.523, P=0.012) and overall survival (HR=11.13, CI=2.460-50.30, P=0.002). In a subgroup with middle hepatic vein reconstruction, occlusion was a significant risk factor for overall survival. (HR=3.289, CI=1.304-8.296, P=0.012) In patients with middle hepatic vein reconstruction whose venous territory volumes were measured, right anterior volume ≥300cm3 was protective for vein occlusion. (OR=0.317, CI=0.152-0.662, P=0.002) In patients with V5 reconstruction, V5 volume ≥150cm3 was protective for vein occlusion. (OR=0.253, CI=0.087-0.734, P=0.011) T
Conclusions : Inferior and middle hepatic vein reconstruction has significant impact on clinical outcome. Hepatic venous territory mapping can provide objective measure for successful reconstruction of venous branches.
SESSION
Oral Presentation 3
Room A 3/4/2022 10:10 AM - 11:00 AM